首页 / 院系成果 / 成果详情页

Effect and safety of propofol for sedation during colonoscopy: A meta-analysis 期刊论文

编号：

a50bd8da-fb0f-4ba4-abde-25651962f6d9
作者：

Zhang, Wenyu(张闻宇)#^[1]Zhu, Zhihua(朱志华)#^[1]Zheng, Yan(郑艳)*^[1]
语种：

英文
期刊：

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA ISSN：0952-8180 2018 年 51 卷 (10 - 18) ; DEC
收录：
关键词：

Propofol Sedation Colonoscopy Meta-analysis
摘要：

Study objectives: The study is to compare the efficacy and safety of propofol with traditional sedation agents for sedation during colonoscopy.
Design: Meta-analysis.
Setting: China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University.
Measurements: We conducted a comprehensive literature search through the database of Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. The continuous outcomes were expressed with weight mean difference (WMD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI); and dichotomous outcomes were expressed with risk ratio (RR) with 95%CI. A fixed-effect model or random-effect model was used to pool the estimate according to the heterogeneity across included studies.
Main results: Nineteen studies involving 2512 patients were included in this study. Compared with traditional sedation agents, propofol had better effects in the recovery time (WMD = - 5.94 min, 95%CI: -9.24, - 2.63; P < 0.001), discharge time (WMD = -33.57 min, 95%CI: - 71.73, -4.60; P = 0.015), satisfaction score (SMD = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.13, 1.33; P = 0.017), time to sedation (WMD = -4.31 min, 95%CI: -4.93, -3.69; P < 0.001), and time to ambulation (WMD = -27.20 min, 95%CI: - 29.84, - 24.56; P < 0.001). Moreover, propofol had comparable effects with traditional sedation agents in terms of other outcomes, including procedure time (WMD = -0.38 min, 95%CI: -0.84, 0.08; P = 0.108), pain score (SMD = 0.22, 95%CI: -0.21, 0.65; P = 0.318), amnesia rate (RR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.78, 1.11; P = 0.431), apnea rate (RR = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.15, 1.85; P = 0.314), decreased heart rate (RR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.51, 1.04; P = 0.080), decreased blood pressure (RR = 1.16, 95%CI: 0.81, 1.66; P = 0.417), and complication rate (RR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.33, 1.15; P = 0.131).
Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that, propofol for sedation during colonoscopy can result in a faster recovery and discharge, a shorter time to sedation and ambulation, as well as improved patient satisfaction, but it did not increase the rate of complications. There is a need for more well-performed, large-scale trials to verify our findings.
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714：

Zhang Wenyu,Zhu Zhihua,Zheng Yan, et al. Effect and safety of propofol for sedation during colonoscopy: A meta-analysis [J].JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA,2018,51:10-18.
APA：

Zhang Wenyu,Zhu Zhihua,Zheng Yan.(2018).Effect and safety of propofol for sedation during colonoscopy: A meta-analysis .JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA,51:10-18.
MLA：

Zhang Wenyu, et al. "Effect and safety of propofol for sedation during colonoscopy: A meta-analysis" .JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA 51(2018):10-18.
条目包含文件：

文件类型：PDF,文件大小：

正在加载全文

未找到全文

浏览次数：30  下载次数：0

分享到：

浏览次数：30

下载次数：0

打印次数：0