首页 / 院系成果 / 成果详情页

Could Nonstructural Interbody Fusion Be an Alternative Surgical Technique for Treatment of Single Segment Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis via a Posterior- Only Approach? 期刊论文

编号：

bcd02e78-7f75-4ffe-bbce-d52bed8a0203
作者：

Suya, Danny#^[1]Shao, Liwei^[1]Gu, Rui(顾锐)*^[1]Xu, Qinli^[1]Luo, Wenqi(罗文琪)^[1]
语种：

英文
期刊：

WORLD NEUROSURGERY ISSN：1878-8750 2019 年 130 卷 (E316 - E323) ; OCT
收录：
关键词：

Interbody fusion Nonstructural Posterior approach only Structural Thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis
摘要：

OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate the efficacy and safety of nonstructural versus structural interbody fusion, using a combination of autograft and allograft bone for treatment of single segment thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis (TB) via a posterior-only approach.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 37 patients who were surgically treated in our department for thoracic and lumbar spinal TB between March 2015 and March 2018 and met our inclusion criteria. Eighteen of these 37 patients underwent nonstructural interbody fusion (group A), whereas the other 19 underwent structural interbody fusion with the aid of titanium mesh cages (group B). We compared and analyzed visual analog scale scores, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, blood loss, operation time, bone fusion rates, and correction angles.
RESULTS: The average duration of follow-up was 20.33 +/- 4.73 months (range, 12-26 months) in group A and 19.63 +/- 4.63 months (range, 12-26 months), in group B. All patients showed significant improvement in neurologic function by 1 or 2 grades. Bone fusion was achieved in all patients, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). However, there were significant between-group differences in operation time (mean, 196.28 +/- 43.49 minutes [range, 128-300 minutes] in group A vs. 223.26 +/- 46.34 minutes [range, 150-300 minutes] in group B; P < 0.05) and estimated blood loss (mean, 474.44 +/- 224.37 mL [range, 200-900 mL] in group A vs. 585.79 +/- 378.82 mL [range, 200-1500] in group B; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The 2 surgical techniques may well have achieved similar results in terms of decreasing bone fusion time, improving neurologic function, and correcting kyphotic angles. However, the nonstructural interbody fusion technique exhibited less blood loss and faster operation time, and thus could serve as an alternative surgical technique for treatment of single-segment thoracic and lumbar spinal TB.
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714：

Suya Danny,Shao Liwei,Gu Rui, et al. Could Nonstructural Interbody Fusion Be an Alternative Surgical Technique for Treatment of Single Segment Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis via a Posterior- Only Approach? [J].WORLD NEUROSURGERY,2019,130:E316-E323.
APA：

Suya Danny,Shao Liwei,Gu Rui,Xu Qinli,&Luo Wenqi.(2019).Could Nonstructural Interbody Fusion Be an Alternative Surgical Technique for Treatment of Single Segment Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis via a Posterior- Only Approach? .WORLD NEUROSURGERY,130:E316-E323.
MLA：

Suya Danny, et al. "Could Nonstructural Interbody Fusion Be an Alternative Surgical Technique for Treatment of Single Segment Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis via a Posterior- Only Approach?" .WORLD NEUROSURGERY 130(2019):E316-E323.
条目包含文件：

文件类型：PDF,文件大小：

正在加载全文

未找到全文

浏览次数：90  下载次数：0

分享到：

浏览次数：90

下载次数：0

打印次数：0